Prediction of Betsy Nagelsen vs Mary Sawyer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nagelsen vs M. Sawyer

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mary Sawyer

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Nagelsen 1 - 0 Sawyer

They have played 5 sets in total, with Betsy Nagelsen winning 4 and Mary Sawyer winning 1. The last match between Betsy Nagelsen and Mary Sawyer was at the Kyoto, 15-10-1979, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 7-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nagelsen	1
Sawyer	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(SF) Kyoto(10-15-79)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Mary Sawyer

(R3) Stuart(03-29-78)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Mary Sawyer

B. Nagelsen vs M. Sawyer H2H Profile

B. Nagelsen	Stats	M. Sawyer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.97% (356-371)	Career Total W/L	43.59% (34-44)
1	Clay	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Nagelsen vs M. Sawyer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mary Sawyer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Betsy Nagelsen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mary Sawyer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mary Sawyer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mary Sawyer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108). Mary Sawyer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mary Sawyer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Betsy Nagelsen winning 2 times and Mary Sawyer being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Betsy Nagelsen winning 4 and Mary Sawyer winning 1.
The last match between Betsy Nagelsen and Mary Sawyer was at the Kyoto, 15-10-1979, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 7-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Betsy Nagelsen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mary Sawyer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mary Sawyer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mary Sawyer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Betsy Nagelsen vs Mary Sawyer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Nagelsen vs M. Sawyer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Nagelsen	Stats	M. Sawyer
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
29	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Sawyer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Perth 1 - 12-01-1981
R3 C AinscoughC. Ainscough	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
R4 Elizabeth MinterE. Minter	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 23-06-1980
Q1 Ann HenrickssonA. Henricksson	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 07-01-1980
R3 Vicki Lancaster KerrV. Lancaster	L	7-6 3-6 11-9	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-12-1979
R4 Naoko SatoN. Sato	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen vs M. Sawyer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Nagelsen	Stats	M. Sawyer
48.97% (356/371)	YTD Win/Loss	43.59% (34/44)
49.59% (850/864)	Sets Win/Loss	45.76% (81/96)
49.70% (7950/8046)	Games Win/Loss	48.00% (806/873)
45.45% (90/108)	Hard Win/Loss	75.00% (3/1)
46.81% (44/50)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/5)
39.53% (51/78)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
60.14% (89/59)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (15/20)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
203.59	Average Opponent Rank	99.87
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	70.00% (7/3)
80.77% (21/5)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (1/1)
37.74% (40/66)	Futures W/L	47.06% (8/9)
49% (348/712)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (33/77)
100% (3/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
56% (5/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
47% (128/273)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (8/23)
81% (348/281)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (38/30)
19% (348/67)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (38/8)
19% (373/72)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (39/3)